By John Ennis
Posted 11-17-2006
Earlier this year, New York’s Supreme Court judicial selection system (where party bosses choose which candidates will appear on the ballot) was ruled unconstitutional by a federal court. LexMetrics will summarize the major players (and their positions) in the battle to reform the current process.
By John Ennis
11-10-2006
Tuesday’s election marked the passing of an era. No longer will New York Supreme Court justices be decided by a judicial nominating convention system — a method the federal courts have ruled unconstitutional. In the pursuit of reform, the state faces several choices. Here are two:
Continue reading "Appoint or Vote?" »
By John Ennis
Posted 11-03-2006
This week’s lead story, Robes in the Closet?, examines the effort to get more openly gay and lesbian judges on the bench. LexMetrics will look at the numbers behind this movement.
Continue reading "Gays and the Bench: By the Numbers" »
By John Ennis
Posted 10-27-2006
How do you know when a region has changed from red to blue? Presidential elections, held once every four years, are an imperfect indicator. The personalities of the candidates might affect the outcome of a single election just as much as party affiliation. Also, to notice a regional switch from one party to the other, an observer needs a sample size that could take a decade or two to reliably reveal itself, even if the shift had actually occurred sometime earlier.
Continue reading "Red to Blue?" »
By John Ennis
Posted 10-20-2006
In this week’s lead story, The Friends of Vito Lopez, the Institute for Judicial Studies examined the process of campaign fund raising as it pertains to judges.
Continue reading "The Song Remains the Same" »
By John Ennis
Posted 10-13-06
This week’s lead story Plea Policy No Bargain, examines the Queens District Attorney’s novel approach to plea bargaining. LexMetrics took the opportunity to look at this issue from a numerical point of view.
Continue reading "Plea Vise" »
By John Ennis
Posted: 10-06-06
A judicial campaign consultant quoted in this week’s lead story, “The Judge Who Came in From the Cold” declares, “When a man runs against a woman in New York County, he generally loses.” This passes for conventional wisdom in the borough of Manhattan, but is it true?
Continue reading "Gender Judgment" »
By John Ennis
Posted: 09-29-06
The New York State Board of Elections publishes all contributions to any judicial campaign that has raised more than $1,000. Their Supreme Court database goes back to 1999. IJS has analyzed the contributions for all the judges currently sitting on the Supreme Court in the five boroughs of New York City. Here are the judges who have raised more than $25,000 since 1999:
Continue reading "Electioneering" »
By John Ennis
Posted on 09-22-06
In the wake of Lopez Torres v. New York State Board of Elections, the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit affirming that New York’s Supreme Court primary selection system is unconstitutional, a debate has emerged on how to approach its reform. One factor often overlooked by the media is judicial experience prior to joining the Supreme Court. This analysis will explore that issue from the eye of the storm: Brooklyn.
Continue reading "Experience Preferred?" »
By John Ennis
Posted on 09-15-06
Here’s an old favorite from First-Year Torts, inspired by a passage in Tom Wolfe’s 1987 novel Bonfire of the Vanities:
Facts: Your client is recuperating from knee surgery in a Westchester hospital when complications arise. It requires the attention of a specialist and the patient is transferred to a Medical Center in Manhattan. He emerges from the operating room well enough, but with little chance of recovering full mobility, which had been anticipated prior to the initial surgery.
Question: Where and when did the malpractice occur?
Answer: In the ambulance while on the Major Deegan Expressway.
Reason: You want a Bronx jury.
Continue reading "The "Bronx Effect"" »
LEXPRESS
Legal News Reviewed
ELECTIONS
Bronx
Brooklyn
Manhattan
Nassau / Suffolk
Queens
Staten Island
Westchester
LINKS
Fund for Modern Courts
Gotham Gazette
National Center for State Courts
City of New York Bar
Bronx Bar
Brooklyn Bar
Queens Bar
Richmond County Bar
New York State Bar
Brennan Center for Justice
NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct
American Judicature Society
Power Plays
Daily Politics
The Politicker
Polit.Bureau
Follow the Leader
Room Eight
Empire Zone
Above the Law
Legal Blog Watch
Legal Pad
Capitol Confidential
Daily Gotham
Sui Generis
Overlawyered
Simple Justice
SUBSCRIBE
To our newsletter
To our rss feed
JUDGES V. PLAINTIFFS
By Mark Thompson
markthomp@yahoo.com
Posted 05-07-08
The Appellate Division rescued plaintiffs in a pair of cases from trial court rulings that, in the appellate panels’ view, unfairly hamstrung the personal injury lawsuits.
In one of the cases, an appellate panel tossed out a verdict for the city in a suit brought by an injured employee because Kings County Justice Joseph Levine allowed the city to ambush the plaintiff with a late-disclosed witness. The plaintiff, Frank Caccioppoli, claimed that he injured his knee in a traffic accident involving his sanitation truck, but the jurors didn’t buy it -- not after having hearing from the surprise witness, a radiologist, who insisted that MRI films showed a degenerative condition in Caccioppoli’s knee.
That was a new theory, the appellate panel noted, and given the way it was sprung on him, Caccioppoli never had time to prepare a rebuttal. Adding insult to injury, the city didn’t bother to offer an excuse for waiting until the last minute to disclose the witness, which is all the more reason why Levine shouldn’t have let the city get away with it, the appellate panel said. Caccioppoli v City of New York (April 29)
By Scott H. Greenfield
Posted 11-21-07
It's been more than 40 years since the U.S. Supreme Court enshrined the principle that due process demands true discovery. Laugh till you cry.
Continue Reading